State v. Tutlewski
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtSnyder, J.
¶ 1. Under Wisconsin law, a witness may not testify that another physically and mentally competent witness is telling the truth. 1 1n the present case, David C. Tutlewski contends that this rule was violated when a State's witness testified that the complaining witness and her husband were incapable of lying. We conclude that this testimony was inadmissible because it invaded the province of the jury. We therefore reverse Tutlewski's judgments of conviction and the order denying postconviction relief and remand for a new trial.
Background
¶ 2. On January 28, 1997, at approximately 7:00 a.m.,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. DyessWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. HaseltineCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
- State v. PittmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. RomeroWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. HuntingtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. NelisWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. KruegerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008
- State v. DelgadoCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
- State v. PrineasCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009
- State v. KruegerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.