Legal Opinion

Wittenberg v. Bornstein CA1/3

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 16, 2021No. A154752Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 2/16/21 Wittenberg v. Bornstein CA1/3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE AMY WITTENBERG, Plaintiff and Respondent, A154752 v. DANIEL BORNSTEIN et al., (Alameda County Super. Ct. No. RG17878949)…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Baral v. SchnittCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Park v. Bd. of Trs. of the Cal. State Univ.California Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Kashian v. HarrimanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. Evans v. UnkowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. Hylton v. Frank E. Rogozienski, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API