Legal Opinion
Harry P. Locklin and Elmer J. Brant, General Partners, Dba Radiant Color Company v. Day-Glo Color Corp., Harry P. Locklin and Elmer J. Brant, General Partners, Dba Radiant Color Company v. Day-Glo Color Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 1, 1972No. 26266Published
1Opinion of the Court
468 F.2d 1359
175 U.S.P.Q. 453
Harry P. LOCKLIN and Elmer J. Brant, General Partners, dba
Radiant Color Company, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
DAY-GLO COLOR CORP., Defendant-Appellee.
Harry P. LOCKLIN and Elmer J. Brant, General Partners, dba
Radiant Color Company, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
DAY-GLO COLOR CORP., Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 26239 and 26266.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Oct. 6, 1972.
Rehearing Denied Dec. 1, 1972.
John R. Murtha (argued), San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants.
Thomas V. Koykka (argued), Cleveland, Ohio, for defendant-appellee.
Before LUMBARD,* MERRILL and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Park-In-Theatres, Inc. v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- Locklin v. Switzer Bros.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
- Thomas E. Pickering v. Orval Holman, Thomas E. Pickering v. Orval HolmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- Carson Inv. Co. v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
- Florida Brace Corporation and Arthur R. Moore v. William L. Bartels and Prosthetic & Orthopedic Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.