Legal Opinion

City of Bowling Green v. Ford

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided March 27, 1936PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Richardson

Affirming.

Eva Ford, on a trial before a jury was awarded $1,223 damages against the city of Bowling Green. The basis of iier recovery was that the city negligently permitted a hole to be and remain in the street near the entrance to the south side of the city’s park, which caused her to fall and injure her knee. In the “horse and buggy days, ’ ’’ the city had constructed on the street, close to this entrance, a “water trough” which was removed a number of years before Mrs. Ford sustained her injury, and when it was removed its place was in part…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. City of Lebanon v. GravesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  2. City of Dayton v. LoryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  3. City of Louisville v. HaughCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  4. City of Covington v. VisseCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  5. City of Lexington v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Louisville v. VerstCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
  2. City of Louisville v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  3. McNeal v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
  4. City of Covington v. McGillCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API