Legal Opinion

City of Louisville v. Moore

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided March 5, 1937PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Morris, Commissioner—

Reversing.

Ernest Moore, a resident of the City of Louisville,. sued the city for $5,104, claiming that due to a defect in the grating of a catch basin upon which he stepped, he was caused to fall and injure himself. Of the sum sought $50 was to recoup him for services of a physician and $54 for loss of time from his customary labors. Upon the trial of the case a jury awarded him $210, and, after motion for a new trial was overruled, judgment was entered for. that amount against the city. Motion is made for appeal.

The alleged injury occurred on…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of Ludlow v. AlbersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  2. Tudor v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  3. City of Covington v. BelserCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  4. City of Dayton v. FoxCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  5. Frank Fehr Brewing Co. v. CorleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rickard v. City of RenoNevada Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Morrow v. City of HarlanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1961
  3. McNeal v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
  4. Sparks v. Western Union Telegraph Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1956
  5. City of Covington v. McGillCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API