Legal Opinion

State v. DeGroat

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1993No. S-93-239PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.

Following a bench trial, the defendant-appellant, Michael E. DeGroat, was adjudged guilty of the unlawful possession of a controlled substance, lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), a felony, in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 28-416(3) and 28-405(c)(9) [Schedule I] (Cum. Supp. 1992). Asserting that his warrantless arrest was unlawful, DeGroat appealed to the Nebraska Court of Appeals and assigned as error the district court’s failure to suppress the physical evidence seized at the time of his arrest and the statement he later made to the police. Under the power granted us by Neb. Rev. Stat. §…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. State v. Van AckerenNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. McDonaldNebraska Supreme Court · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. KonfrstNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. DyerNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. NeujahrNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. OsbornNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. GarzaNebraska Supreme Court · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API