Legal Opinion
Chenoweth v. City of New Brighton
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 28, 2003No. C0-02-945PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STONEBURNER, Judge.
Joseph and Vickie Chenoweth, and Creative Growth, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, d/b/a Chenoweth Floral and Greenhouses, appeal the denial of their petition for a writ of mandamus to compel the City of New Brighton to initiate condemnation proceedings to compensate them for damage to their property caused by city-facilitated private development on adjacent property. Because the city’s involvement in the development does not constitute state action for purposes of stating a claim for inverse condemnation, we affirm.
FACTS
Appellants Joseph and Vickie Chenow-eth, and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Armstrong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Alevizos v. Metropolitan Air. Com'n of Mpls. & St. P.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- State v. WicklundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Dickerman v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Zeman v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Oliver v. State Ex Rel. Commissioner of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- Chenoweth v. City of New BrightonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- RK Midway, LLC v. Metropolitan CouncilCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- Ugorets v. City of ShorewoodDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2023