Rumpf v. Rumpf
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Dissent
BOND, Chief Justice.
I am not in accord with the majority. The roll in this appeal presents a question of law cognizable by Federal Courts as well as by the courts of Texas, whether the decrees of a trial court in the State of Minnesota, conformably to the statutes of that State may be enforced in the courts of Texas under the “full faith and credit” provision of the Federal Constitution, Art. IV, sec. 1, and Acts of Congress enacted pursuant thereto, sec. 687 as amended, 28 U.S.C.A. § 1738; and, too, under the principles of interstate comity recognized by all states, importing absolute verity…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Barber v. Barber Ex Rel. CronkhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
- Sistare v. SistareSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Fauntleroy v. LumSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Lynde v. LyndeSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Barber v. BarberSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.