Legal Opinion · Dissent

California Motor Transport Co. v. State Board of Equalization

California Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1947No. Sac. No. 5749Published

1DissentTraynor, J.

I dissent. Under the California Motor Vehicle Transportation License Tax Law as construed by this court, an operator of motor vehicles engaged in intercity transportation of goods must include in the taxable gross receipts from such transportation revenue derived from services incidental to the intercity transportation. This court has held that receipts from a pickup and delivery service maintained for door-to-door delivery are taxable as part of the gross receipts from intercity transportation of the goods. (Bekins Van Lines, Inc. v. Johnson, 21 Cal.2d 135 [130 P.2d 421]; Southern California…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bodinson Manufacturing Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Estate of MadisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Bekins Van Lines, Inc. v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Mitchel v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. County of Sierra v. County of NevadaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API