Thorson v. California Student Aid Commission (In Re Thorson)
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
OLLASON, Bankruptcy Judge:
Debtor Mark G. Thorson (“Thorson”) has appealed a summary judgment of nondis-chargeability of his student loan. Thorson argued that deferments granted post-due date were not required to be deducted from the prepetition repayment period, the length of which determines the loan’s dischargeability in bankruptcy. This is a matter of first impression. Finding no support for Thor-son’s theory, we affirm.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
The parties stipulated to the following facts. In 1982, Thorson obtained two federal student loans totalling $5,000 from Citibank which were…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- William Michael Jones v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, United Transportation UnionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- John H. Fortney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Saburah v. United States Department of Education (In Re Saburah)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kashikar v. Turnstile Capital Management, LLC (In Re Kashikar)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Institute of Imaginal Studies v. Christoff (In Re Christoff)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Manriquez v. Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corp. (In Re Manriquez)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- In re: Melissa Hoda KashikarUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- In re: Tarra Nichole ChristoffUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.