Legal Opinion
Espenschied v. Mallick
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 18, 1993No. 90-CV-1247 & 91-CV-281PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRYOR, Senior Judge:
This appeal arises from the Superior Court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of appellees, Raj and Theodora Malliek, in their action for possession of real property against appellant, Peter Espenschied. Appellant contends that the trial court erred (1) by denying appellant’s motion to quash service of process, and (2) by failing to consider appellee’s claim of retaliatory eviction. 1 We affirm.
Appellant was a commercial tenant operating a bookstore in a mixed-use building owned and managed by appellees, located at 2603 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C.…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Petermann v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 396California Court of Appeal · 1959
- Green v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Yvonne C. Edwards v. Nathan HabibCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- Reste Realty Corporation v. CooperSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- 1266 Apt. Corp. v. New Horizon DeliNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
- Port of Longview v. International Raw Materials, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1999
- Columbus Properties, Inc. v. O'CONNELLDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Wilson v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- City Center Real Estate, LLC v. 1606 7th Street NW, LLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2021