Carrington v. Crandall
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBudge, J.
— This action was brought by appellant to quiet title to the right to the use of 160 inches of the waters of Mahogany Creek in Teton County. The cause regularly came on for trial, evidence, oral and documentary, was offered and introduced on behalf of appellant whereupon appellant rested. Respondents thereupon moved the Court for judgment of non-suit upon several grounds. If we are correct in our conclusion, there is but one ground of the motion that needs consideration, namely,' that the evidence introduced by appellant, without contradiction, established the fact that appellant had conveyed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Smith v. BrittenhamIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
- Sykes v. BeckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
- Daneri v. GazzolaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Wilson v. KentSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
- Withington v. EricksonIdaho Supreme Court · 1936
3Cited by12 opinions
- Christensen Family Trust v. ChristensenIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
- St. Luke's Regional Medical Center, Ltd. v. Board of CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
- Matter of Various Water Rights in Lake DeSmetWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
- L Slash X Cattle Co. v. Texaco, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1981
- Scona, Inc. v. Green Willow TrustIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.