Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Kent

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1906No. 4769PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of San Miguel County. Hon. Theron Stevens, Judge. Action by Joseph Kent, P. P. Steinwandel, John G-anlt, F. W. Moore as assignee of Jerry Haverly, B. 1ST. Bogers and Charles Dollarhide against B. H. Wilson. From a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey

The complaint in this action shows that defendant, Wilson, had the legal title to certain mining-property as trustee for the plaintiffs, the interest of the plaintiffs being in proportion to the amount of certain several judgments obtained by them against The Eagle Cold Mining Company; that, acting- as *494sucli trustee, defendant received certain moneys and certain shares of capital stock of The Colorado Gold Mining and Milling Company, a corporation, which moneys and stock came to his hands on account of the trust estate; that the defendant, in violation of his duties as such trustee, refused…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. BrittenhamIllinois Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Carrington v. CrandallIdaho Supreme Court · 1942
  2. W. F. Pigg & Son, Inc. v. United States ex rel. LeachCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
  3. McPhail v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1917
  4. Erie Mining & Milling Co. v. GearingSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  5. Clavel v. FougnierSupreme Court of Colorado · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API