Daneri v. Gazzola
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
COOPER, C.
Appeal from judgment and order denying defendants’ motion for a new trial. It appears by the pleadings that on July 10, 1895, the defendants executed to the plaintiff’s intestate, John Daneri, their joint and several promissory note for the sum of three thousand dollars, payable one day after date. The complaint contains the usual allegations, setting forth the note, the payments, and non-payment of balance due.
The defendants Giacomo Gazzola and Giacomo Canova answered together, but in an answer separate from defendant John B. Gazzola. In their answer they alleged, in substance,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Harlan v. ElyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Curiac v. PackardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Tuffree v. Stearns Ranchos Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
- Huffman v. HulbertNew York Supreme Court · 1835
- Hayes v. JosephiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bridge v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Tyson v. ReineckeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
- Carrington v. CrandallIdaho Supreme Court · 1942
- Wise v. ClapperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Daneri v. GazzolaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.