Legal Opinion
Moore v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided August 15, 2000No. 23234PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN E. PARRISH, Presiding Judge.
Gerald W. Moore (movant) appeals the denial of a Rule 29.15 motion directed to his conviction for possession of a controlled substance. See State v. Moore, 972 S.W.2d 658 (Mo.App.1998). Movant filed a pro se motion. Counsel was appointed and an amended motion filed. The motion was denied after an evidentiary hearing. This court affirms.
One of the grounds raised in movant’s amended motion was a claim that he received ineffective assistance of counsel in the underlying criminal case. Mov-ant alleged that the attorney who represented him in his criminal case…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
- Armour v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- State v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Norville v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- Waters v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004