Norville v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN E. PARRISH, Judge.
Johnny Norville (movant) appeals the denial of a motion for post-conviction relief directed to his conviction for possession of methamphetamine, a controlled substance. See State v. Norville, 23 S.W.3d 673 (Mo.App.2000). Movant filed a pro se motion as permitted by Rule 29.15. Counsel was appointed and an amended motion filed. The motion was denied following an evi-dentiary hearing. This court affirms.
The facts that led to movant’s conviction are recited in the opinion rendered in mov-ant’s direct appeal, State v. Norville, supra. They will not be repeated except as…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
- State v. HallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
- Callahan v. RobtoySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Kilgore v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
- Walls v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. AshAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
- Rutherford v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- Oglesby v. BowersoxCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Barnes v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- Maberry v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.