Legal Opinion

Norville v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 28, 2002No. 24485PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN E. PARRISH, Judge.

Johnny Norville (movant) appeals the denial of a motion for post-conviction relief directed to his conviction for possession of methamphetamine, a controlled substance. See State v. Norville, 23 S.W.3d 673 (Mo.App.2000). Movant filed a pro se motion as permitted by Rule 29.15. Counsel was appointed and an amended motion filed. The motion was denied following an evi-dentiary hearing. This court affirms.

The facts that led to movant’s conviction are recited in the opinion rendered in mov-ant’s direct appeal, State v. Norville, supra. They will not be repeated except as…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  2. State v. HallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
  3. Callahan v. RobtoySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Kilgore v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  5. Walls v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. AshAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  2. Rutherford v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Oglesby v. BowersoxCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  4. Barnes v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Maberry v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API