Legal Opinion

Ayers v. Anderson

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided January 14, 2020No. 3:16-cv-00572Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE WILLIAM AYERS PLAINTIFF vs. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-CV-572-CRS TIM ANDERSON, et al. DEFENDANTS MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on second motion for summary judgment by Defendants. DN 58. Plaintiff filed a response. DN 59. This matter is now ripe for adjudication. For the reasons below, Defendants’ motion for summary judgment will be granted. I. Legal Standard Summary judgment is appropriate when the moving party can show “there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Stringer v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API