Dougherty v. Haag
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SELLS, P. J.
I. INTRODUCTION
This is a “common law right of fair procedure” case. (E.g., Pinsker v. Pacific Coast Society of Orthodontists (1974) 12 Cal.3d 541 [116 Cal.Rptr. 245, 526 P.2d 253] (Pinsker II); James v. Marinship Corp. (1944) 25 Cal.2d 721 [155 P.2d 329] (Marinship); Yari v. Producers Guild of America, Inc. (2008) 161 Cal.App.4th 172 [73 Cal.Rptr.3d 803] (Yari); Oskooi v. Fountain Valley Regional Hospital (1996) 42 Cal.App.4th 233 [49 Cal.Rptr.2d 769] (Oskooi).)
The right of fair procedure derives, as our high court pointed out in Pinsker II, from the common law, and should…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- James v. Marinship Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Anton v. San Antonio Community HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Pinsker v. Pacific Coast Society of OrthodontistsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Pinsker v. Pacific Coast Society of OrthodontistsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Ezekial v. WinkleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- El-Attar v. Hollywood Presbyterian Medical CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- Cumbre, Inc. v. State Compensation Insurance FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Natarajan v. Dignity HealthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019