Legal Opinion

Dougherty v. Haag

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 28, 2008No. G038335PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SELLS, P. J.

I. INTRODUCTION

This is a “common law right of fair procedure” case. (E.g., Pinsker v. Pacific Coast Society of Orthodontists (1974) 12 Cal.3d 541 [116 Cal.Rptr. 245, 526 P.2d 253] (Pinsker II); James v. Marinship Corp. (1944) 25 Cal.2d 721 [155 P.2d 329] (Marinship); Yari v. Producers Guild of America, Inc. (2008) 161 Cal.App.4th 172 [73 Cal.Rptr.3d 803] (Yari); Oskooi v. Fountain Valley Regional Hospital (1996) 42 Cal.App.4th 233 [49 Cal.Rptr.2d 769] (Oskooi).)

The right of fair procedure derives, as our high court pointed out in Pinsker II, from the common law, and should…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. James v. Marinship Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Anton v. San Antonio Community HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Pinsker v. Pacific Coast Society of OrthodontistsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Pinsker v. Pacific Coast Society of OrthodontistsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Ezekial v. WinkleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. El-Attar v. Hollywood Presbyterian Medical CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Cumbre, Inc. v. State Compensation Insurance FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. Natarajan v. Dignity HealthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API