Legal Opinion
OKOH
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 1994No. ID 3227PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Interim Decision #3227 MATTER OF OKOH In Exclusion Proceedings A-28333422 Decided by Board August 29, 1994 The Board of Immigration Appeals has no jurisdiction over an alien's motion to reconsider its prior decision in exclusion proceedings after the order is executed and the alien has-been excluded and deported from the United States. Matter of Keyte,
20 I&N Dec. 158
(BIA 1990), distinguished. EXCLUDABLE: Act of 1952—Sec. 212(a)(2)(A) (i)(11) [ 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(2)(A) (i)(11))—Controlled substance violation ON BEHALF OF APPLICANT: ON BEHALF OF SERVICE: Alton G. Rose, Esquire Craig A. Harlow…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Orlando Roldan v. James Racette, Superintendent, Adirondack Correctional Facility, and U.S. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Cristina Galeas Castaneda v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- CERNABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1991
- Arturo Ascencio Mendez v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Gustavo Marrero v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- ARMENDAREZBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2008
- G-N-CBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1998
- LUISBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1999
- BULNESBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2009
- MORALESBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.