Legal Opinion

United States v. Logemann

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided December 14, 1973No. 27,174Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Darden, Chief Judge:

After the Navy denied his application for discharge as a conscientious objector, the accused decided he would serve no longer and disobeyed the order, of a superior noncommissioned officer to "go to work.” A special court-martial convicted the accused of this offense. After the conviction, a United States District Court granted the accused a writ of ha-beas corpus, holding: (1) that the accused’s discharge application had been denied without a basis in fact, and (2) that the Navy failed to follow the procedures outlined in its own regulations. Logemann…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Parisi v. DavidsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. SpellerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  3. United States v. NoydUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  4. United States v. LenoxUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
  5. United States v. GoguenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API