Legal Opinion

Forefront Machining Technologies, Inc. v. Alouette Tool Company

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided August 16, 2021No. 3:19-cv-00383Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON FOREFRONT MACHINING : Case No. 3:19-cv-383 TECHNOLOGIES, INC., : : Plaintiff, : District Judge Thomas M. Rose : Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington vs. : : SARIX SA, et al., : Defendants. : DECISION & ORDER I. Introduction This case involves the termination of an oral contract for sales commissions between Plaintiff Forefront Machining Technologies, Inc. (“Forefront”), and Defendants SARIX SA (“SARIX”) and Alouette Tool Company, Ltd. (“Alouette”) (collectively, “Defendants”). The discovery disputes presently…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. William C. Lewis v. Acb Business Services, Inc., (96-3093/3498), American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. James P. Connors, (96-3498)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  2. Deniece Scales v. J.C. Bradford and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  3. Catskill Development, L.L.C. v. Park Place Entertainment Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  4. Hendricks v. Total Quality Logistics, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2011
  5. American Electric Power Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API