State v. Frasieur
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Per curiam
Defendant appeals his conviction for escape in the second degree, asserting that disciplinary sanctions that he received on his return to prison constituted criminal punishment, with the result that this prosecution violated the double jeopardy clauses of the state and federal constitutions. He recognizes that we rejected similar arguments in State v. Rezin, 139 Or App 156, 911 P2d 1264 (1996), withdrawn by order March 28, 1996, reasoning readopted and reaffirmed State v. Whittlinger, 142 Or App 308, 919 P2d 1206 (1996). He argues, however, relying on a footnote in Rezin, 139 Or App at 163 n…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- State v. RezinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- State v. WhittlingerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999