Legal Opinion
Levi v. City of Ontario
District Court, C.D. California
Decided January 14, 1999No. CV 96-7559 SVW (SHx)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
WILSON, District Judge.
TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
I.Procedural History
Plaintiffs filed this action on October 28, 1996, seeking a declaration that’Ontario’s adult business zoning ordinance constitutes an unconstitutional restriction on adult speech and an injunction barring enforcement of the ordinance. Although Ontario also requires adult businesses to obtain a conditional use permit (“CUP”), Plaintiffs do not challenge the constitutionality of the CUP process.
In an order dated May 22, 1997, this Court held that Plaintiffs could not…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Clark v. Community for Creative Non-ViolenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Reno v. American Civil Liberties UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Steven A. Diamond v. City of Taft, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Red-Eyed Jack, Inc. v. City of Daytona BeachDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2004
- McKibben v. Snohomish CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2014