Legal Opinion

McKibben v. Snohomish County

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided December 5, 2014No. Case No. C13-1293JLRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

JAMES L. ROBART, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

The matter comes before the court on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. (See Plf. Mot. (Dkt. # 20); Def. Mot. (Dkt. #23).) This case arises from Plaintiff Phil McKibben’s attempts to open an adult cabaret. Mr. McKibben argues that Defendant Snohomish County’s (“County”) zoning restrictions on adult entertainment violate the First Amendment. Having considered the submissions of the parties, the balance of the record, and the relevant law, and having heard oral argument, the court DENIES Mr.…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API