McKibben v. Snohomish County
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
JAMES L. ROBART, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The matter comes before the court on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. (See Plf. Mot. (Dkt. # 20); Def. Mot. (Dkt. #23).) This case arises from Plaintiff Phil McKibben’s attempts to open an adult cabaret. Mr. McKibben argues that Defendant Snohomish County’s (“County”) zoning restrictions on adult entertainment violate the First Amendment. Having considered the submissions of the parties, the balance of the record, and the relevant law, and having heard oral argument, the court DENIES Mr.…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.