Legal Opinion
Red-Eyed Jack, Inc. v. City of Daytona Beach
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided June 1, 2004No. 6:01CV429ORL28KRS, 6:01CV761ORL28KRSPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ANTOON, District Judge.
This cause came on for consideration without oral argument on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. 1 The City of Daytona Beach (“the City”), through its zoning ordinances, has attempted to regulate “adult businesses” in Daytona Beach. The central issue in the parties’ motions for summary judgment is whether the City’s zoning ordinances violate the Plaintiffs’ First Amendment rights. For the reasons discussed below, the City’s motion for final summary judgment is granted and The Boulevard Del, Inc.’s (“Boulevard Del”) motion for partial summary judgment…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Lady J. Lingerie, Inc. v. City of JacksonvilleCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Daytona Grand, Inc. v. City of Daytona BeachCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- County of Du Page v. LAKE STREET SPA, INC.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2009