Weinman v. Gray
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
CONLEY, J. *
Two women drivers collided in an intersection regulated by traffic lights. Each maintained that she was without fault and that the other woman was wholly to blame. The jury believed that each of them was negligent and brought in a verdict for defendant on the complaint and for the cross-defendant on the cross-complaint, thus impliedly determining that contributory negligence barred recovery by either. The trial judge believed that the evidence did not justify the verdict and granted plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.
The collision occurred on February 25, 1959, at approximately…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Green v. SouleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Brooks v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Richardson v. HamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Mazzotta v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Yarrow v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.