Legal Opinion

Weinman v. Gray

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 16, 1962No. Civ. 6769Published

1Opinion of the Court

CONLEY, J. *

Two women drivers collided in an intersection regulated by traffic lights. Each maintained that she was without fault and that the other woman was wholly to blame. The jury believed that each of them was negligent and brought in a verdict for defendant on the complaint and for the cross-defendant on the cross-complaint, thus impliedly determining that contributory negligence barred recovery by either. The trial judge believed that the evidence did not justify the verdict and granted plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.

The collision occurred on February 25, 1959, at approximately…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Green v. SouleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Brooks v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Richardson v. HamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Mazzotta v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Yarrow v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API