Legal Opinion

Levenson v. Cohen

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1930No. Docket No. 111, Calendar No. 34,517PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

Plaintiffs brought this suit to declare a deed and land contract back a mortgage, to restrain its forfeiture as a land contract, and, upon a claim of usury, to have the amount of the debt adjusted. Defendants filed cross-bill for foreclosure of the contract. The court held the transaction a mortgage, the loan usurious, found the debt at the sum of $8,200, allowed defendants interest at six per cent, per annum, and decreed foreclosure as a mortgage. Defendants appealed.

The deed and contract were executed and delivered simultaneously. Neither made any mention 'of mortgages outstanding of some…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clark v. LandonMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Skupinski v. Provident Mortgage Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Maginn v. CashinMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Huebner v. LashleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Judd v. CarnegieMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Alber v. BradleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Rowe v. William Ford & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Wilson v. PotterMichigan Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API