Legal Opinion

Alber v. Bradley

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1948No. Docket No. 86, Calendar No. 43,973PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarr, J.

Plaintiffs brought suit in circuit court to have a deed construed as a mortgage, asking also for an accounting and other incidental relief with reference thereto. The facts are not in dispute. In 1919, plaintiffs, who are husband and wife, purchased a farm in Salem township, Washtenaw county. At the time, they executed a mortgage on the property to secure an indebtedness in the sum of $5,000. Shortly thereafter a second mortgage was executed by plaintiffs to secure repayment of a loan to them of $2,200. Through assignment, ownership of the mortgages was acquired by May N. Bradley, a resident…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kole v. LampenMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Cornell v. HallMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  3. McKeighan v. Citizens Commercial & Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Emerson v. AtwaterMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
  5. Rossman v. HutchinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1939

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sheets v. HubenMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Judd v. CarnegieMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Porritt v. StoneMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Simington v. GoldsteinMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Wilson v. PotterMichigan Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API