Legal Opinion

North Pacific Public Service Co. v. Carter

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1924No. 18148PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, C. J.

The plaintiff brought this action to recover a balance claimed to be due for electric current furnished by it.. The defendants denied the material allegations of the complaint and, by cross-complaint, sought recovery of damages, claiming that the plaintiff had breached its contract in refusing to continue to furnish electric current for lighting and domestic purposes. The cause was tried to the court without a jury, and resulted in findings of fact, conclusions of law, and a judgment denying to the plaintiff any re- _ *588covery, and awarding to the defendants, upon their cross-complaint, damages…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. BengstonWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Sears Roebuck & Co. v. NilsenWashington Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API