Legal Opinion

Sears Roebuck & Co. v. Nilsen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1933No. 24655. Department TwoPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

This appeal is from a judgment of dismissal after a trial on the merits to the court without a jury.

The action was brought by appellant against respondent Nilsen, as executor of Rose T. Jackson, deceased, against him individually, and his wife, Marie S. Nilsen, to recover $6,089.15, with interest, for a quantity of merchandise sold to them between March 24, 1931, and May 27, 1931, the three principal items of which were for wall beds, electric ranges and light fixtures.

The claim was served and filed against the executor for a total of $15,058.88 and interest, $8,969.73 being for merchandise…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. King v. BrehmeWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  2. North Pacific Public Service Co. v. CarterWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Pugh v. DoupeWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Mielke v. HansWashington Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hovila v. BartekWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Automatic Canteen Co. v. Automatic Canteen Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Weaver v. McClintock-trunkey Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Pierce v. Mountain Lion Consolidated Mines Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API