Legal Opinion

People v. Montgomery

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 20, 1955No. Crim. 1025PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHELL, J. pro tem. *

Defendant and appellant herein was charged with a violation of Penal Code, section 476a, issuing a check without sufficient funds on May 10, 1953, and with the prior conviction of a felony. He was tried before a jury, which on October 29, 1954, returned a verdict of guilty. His motion for a new trial and application for probation were denied. He was committed to the California Institution for Men at Chino.

Appellant urges a reversal of the judgment of conviction upon the following grounds :

1. That the trial court committed prejudicial error throughout the course of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. People v. BercovitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. People v. RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. People v. GibsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. People v. WademanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. BlackCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Rendel v. MummertArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  3. People v. SparksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. People v. BerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. State v. ChurchillSupreme Court of Vermont · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API