Legal Opinion

Coppin v. Pankow

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1952No. File 7282PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSature, J.

The plaintiffs bring this action against the defendants for damages for trespassing and to compel them to remove á garage and driveway alleged to extend partly on plaintiffs’ property.

The complaint alleges that the defendants are the owners of lot nine in block ten, Parkside Addition to the city of Wahpeton, Richland County, North Dakota and that plaintiffs are the owners of lot eight in block ten, Parkside Addition to the city of Walipeton, Richland County, North Dakota; that the defendants constructed and built partially on plaintiffs’ said •lot a private garage and driveway and have taken…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Retterath v. RetterathNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1949
  2. State ex rel. McClory v. McGruerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Security Improvement Co. v. Cass CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Swanston v. Swanston Equipment CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Hovland v. HovlandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Park Board of City of Williston v. SchumacherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Evenson v. EvensonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API