Legal Opinion

Park Board of City of Williston v. Schumacher

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1956No. 7579PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

This is a statutory form of action to quiet title brought by the plaintiff to determine adverse claims to Block 10 of Wittmeier Addition to the City of Williston, according to the recorded plat thereof in the office of the register of deeds, Williams County, North Dakota, which block is sometimes known as Riverside Park. Robert S. Witt-meier interposed a separate answer and counterclaim to the complaint alleging that he was the sole heir at law of Virginia S. Wittmeier and her husband, Carl A. Witt-meier. He asserts that the land in controversy was conveyed as a gift to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. BlixtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Retterath v. RetterathNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Belakjon v. HilstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Coppin v. PankowNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Cornelius v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Spicer v. HamiltonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Barr v. Barnes County Board of County CommissionersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Barr v. Barnes County Board of County CommissionersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API