Legal Opinion
Rose Glynne v. WilMed Healthcare
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided October 18, 2012No. 11-1859PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THACKER, Circuit Judge:
Wilson Medical Center (“WMC”) appeals an amended order, and judgment entered August 8, 2011, nunc pro tunc March 1, 2011. WMC argues that the district court improperly used the nunc pro tunc device to extend the period during which appellee Rose Glynne, M.D., could refile her dismissed state law claims in state court. Because the district court’s purported nunc pro tunc entry supplied an order that in fact was not previously made, we must vacate the amended order and judgment.
I
Dr. Glynne is a board-certified obstetrician/gynecologist who held privileges at WMC…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Aikens v. IngramCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
- American Bankers Insurance Group, Incorporated v. Richard F. Long Lillie M. LongCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
- Crosby v. MillsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
- Bohdan Maksymchuk v. Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster General Peter L. Garwood, General Manager, Eeoc Appeals Division Us Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Ex parte BuskirkCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1896
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Keith Stansell v. Revolutionary Armed Forces of Columbia, (FARC)Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- Ardella Patterson v. Chrysler GroupCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Susan Lynne Rohe v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
- Glynne v. Wilson Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
- Frongillo v. Bank of STX, inc.Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2026
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.