Legal Opinion
Crosby v. Mills
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 6, 1969No. 149-68PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant Crosby brought an independent action against defendants-appellees Mills and others to have certain orders of the referee, in bankruptcy proceedings brought under Chapter XII of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C. §§ 801-926, by Mills, declared void. There is no diversity of citizenship. The trial court held that the action was an impermissible collateral attack against the orders of the referee and that it had no jurisdiction.
Mills filed the Chapter XII proceedings on December 13, 1965. The first meeting of the creditors was held January 14, 1966. On…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Katchen v. LandySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. United States Realty & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Ex Parte City BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
- Pacific Railroad of Missouri v. Missouri Pacific Ry. Co. And Others. 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- In Re Auto-Train Corporation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- U.S. Philips Corp. v. KBC Bank N.V.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Zimmerman v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Rapid City, S.D.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Oliver T. Carr, Jr. v. District of Columbia, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- New York State Ass'n for Retarded Children, Inc. v. CareyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1977
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.