Legal Opinion
United States v. C.M. (A Juvenile)
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 8, 2007No. 05-50585PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge FERGUSON; Dissent by Judge CALLAHAN.
FERGUSON, Circuit Judge.
Title 18 U.S.C. § 5033 of the Juvenile Delinquency Act (“JDA”) prescribes the process due to a juvenile who is placed in federal custody. The arresting officer must immediately advise the juvenile of his or her rights; immediately advise the juvenile’s parents, guardian, or custodian of the juvenile’s rights; comply with any request by the juvenile to speak with his or her parents or a parental surrogate; and bring the juvenile before a magistrate judge “forthwith.” None of these requirements were met in this case —…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John DOE, a Juvenile Male, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. John Doe, (Juvenile)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Juvenile (Rra-A)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Redding v. Safford Unified School Dist. No. 1Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Juvenile MaleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Juvenile MaleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. A.S.R.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2015
- Redding v. Safford Unified School Dist. No. 1Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.