Legal Opinion

United States v. Juvenile Male

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 12, 2008No. 07-50107PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM Opinion; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge BERZON.

2Per curiam

R.P., a male juvenile, appeals from a proceeding in which he was found to be a juvenile delinquent based on violations of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(ii) (transporting illegal aliens in the United States) and § 1324(a)(2)(B)(ii) (bringing illegal aliens to the United States for “commercial advantage or private financial gain”). He contends that the juvenile information should have been dismissed because the government violated certain provisions of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974, Pub.L. No.…

3Cases cited45 opinions

  1. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Bank of Nova Scotia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Bellotti v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Juvenile MaleCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. MaleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. JuvenileCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. United States v. Juvenile MaleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. Juvenile MaleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API