Legal Opinion

Sabela v. Newport Mining Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1915No. Docket No. 56PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Gogebic; Cooper, J. Case by George Sabela against the Newport Mining Company for personal injuries. Judgment for defendant upon a directed verdict. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtKuhn, J.

The plaintiff was a trammer in the defendant’s mine, and his duties, as claimed by him, were shoveling ore into four-wheeled steel cars, called “buggies,” and pushing (or tramming) the buggies to and from chutes where they were dumped. It appears that trammers work in pairs, and the plaintiff had been the partner of one Steve Levendosky several weeks. On the day of the accident, according to the plaintiff’s testimony, he protested to the trammer boss about the defective condition of the buggy and track which caused the buggy to fall between the rails occasionally, and was promised by him that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stoll v. LaubengayerMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Iamurri v. Saginaw City Gas Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Seccombe v. Detroit Electric RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Jackson v. Schillinger Bros.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Calliari v. FisherMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Bacon v. PayneMichigan Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API