McCracken v. Teets
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.
Petitioner is confined under a judgment which imposes the death sentence for first degree murder. He has appealed from a judgment which denies his petition for mandate to compel the warden of San Quentin to institute proceedings for an inquiry into his sanity, and the attorney general has moved in the alternative to dismiss the appeal as frivolous on its face (see People v. Shorts (1948), 32 Cal.2d 502, 506, 516, 518 [197 P.2d 330] ; Williams v. Duffy (1948), 32 Cal.2d 578, 583 [197 P.2d 341] ; People v. Adamson (1949), 34 Cal.2d 320, 338 [210 P.2d 13]) or, on like grounds, to affirm the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. AdamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Tupman v. HaberkernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- People v. ShortsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Solesbee v. BalkcomSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Southern California Jockey Club, Inc. v. California Horse Racing BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Butt v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Develop-Amatic Engineering v. REPUBLIC MORTGAGECalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- De Angeles v. Roos Bros., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- Garcia v. MunroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Visini v. VisiniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.