Legal Opinion

Schroeder v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 4, 1925No. 318PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRogers, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). It appears that, before the jury was impaneled or sworn, his counsel moved, upon an agreed statement of facts, that the information be dismissed. In making this motion, counsel relied on the claim that the evidence relied on by the government was obtained in violation of the constitutional rights of the defendant as secured to Mm under the Fourth and Fifth Amendments to the Constitution.

The Fourth Amendment declares that “the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Burdeau v. McDowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Twining v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1908

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. People v. KnowlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. United States v. PuglieseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  3. People v. KrupaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. United States v. WexlerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
  5. State v. ToombsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API