Legal Opinion

Acme Land & Fur Co. v. Commissioner

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 10, 1936No. 8020PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

The sole question this petition presents for review is whether moneys, paid petitioner out of amounts raised by the inhabitants of the city of New Orleans to reimburse owners of crevasse property for losses from the destruction of wild life thereon, were income subject to taxation.

Petitioner insists that it was not, because (1) the payment was not gain derived from capital or labor, or gain from both capital and labor, or gain through the sale or conversion of capital, but a mere gratuity or gift and therefore not income within the meaning of the statute. (2) It was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Texas & Pacific Ry. Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Flynn v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935
  4. City of Houston v. StewartTexas Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Fullilove v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Audigier v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1954
  2. Audigier v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1954
  3. Delacroix Corp. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936
  4. Opinion Number, Louisiana Attorney General Reports2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API