Legal Opinion

Texas & Pacific Ry. Co. v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 16, 1932No. 634PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Robebts

During federal control of railways that of petitioner was operated by the Director General under the act of March 21, 1918. Pursuant to the Transportation Act, 1920, 2 the Government relinquished the property March 1, 1920; petitioner accepted the provisions of § 209 3 of the act, and consequently received for the six months period commencing March 1, 1920, an allowance awarded by the Interstate Commerce Commission to make good the guaranty embodied in that section. The company omitted this sum from taxable income returned for the year 1920. After audit the Commissioner of Internal Revenue…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Edwards v. Cuba RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. United States v. Guaranty Trust Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1930

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Helvering v. Midland Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. General American Investors Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Brown Shoe Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. United States v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Lynch v. Borough of EdgewaterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API