Legal Opinion

Lane v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 19, 1907No. Civ. No. 404PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPLICATION for writ of prohibition to the Superior Court of Kings County. John G. Covert, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtTaggart, J.

Application for writ of prohibition.

One David Bonham commenced an action in the justice’s court of Lucerne township, Kings county, against petitioner to recover $200 as money had and received. Judgment was for defendant (petitioner here) for costs, and plaintiff appealed.

The judgment was rendered April 25, 1907, and on May 23, 1907, plaintiff served defendant with a notice of appeal to.the superior court from said judgment. The same day he filed an undertaking on appeal reciting that his appeal was “from a judgment entered against him, in said action, in the said Superior Court,” etc., and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stockton Combine Harvester & Agricultural Works v. Glen's Falls Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Coker v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  3. City of Santa Barbara v. EldredCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. McCracken v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Arroyo Ditch & Water Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cohen v. ConnickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  2. W. P. Jeffries Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  3. Stimpson Computing Scale Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  4. State Ex Rel. Walls v. District CourtWyoming Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Vignolo v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API