Legal Opinion

Tarr v. Ciasulli

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided August 9, 2004PublishedCited by 154 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wallace

This case involves claims of hostile work environment and sexual harassment under New Jersey’s Law Against Discrimination (LAD), N.J.S.A. 10:5-1 to -49. Plaintiff filed a complaint against Bob Ciasulli (Ciasulli) and various of his wholly-owned corporations and their employees. Prior to trial, all defendants were dismissed except for Ciasulli, Bob Ciasulli Auto Group (Auto Group), and Bob Ciasulli’s Mack Auto Mall, Inc. (Mack Auto Mall). At trial, the court dismissed plaintiffs claim for emotional distress damages and the claim against Ciasulli individually. The jury found Mack Auto Mall…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Lehmann v. Toys 'R' US, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  5. Jin Ku Kim, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Nash Finch Company, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by154 opinions

  1. Leang v. Jersey City Board of EducationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
  2. Battaglia v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
  3. Murphy v. ImplicitoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
  4. Cicchetti v. Morris County Sheriff's OfficeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
  5. Ivan v. County of MiddlesexDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2009

149 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API