Legal Opinion

Prudencio v. Hanselmann

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided December 3, 1959No. 4-59-Civ.-121PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEVITT, Chief Judge.

This action is for personal injuries sustained in a collision of the three defendants’ automobiles in southern Minnesota. The plaintiff, who was a passenger in.the automobile of the defendant Hanselmann, is a citizen of Bolivia and lives in Minnesota. Hanselmann is a citizen and resident of North Dakota, while the remaining defendants, Chou- anard and Huelskamp, are both citizens and residents of Minnesota.

Defendant Hanselmann moves to dismiss this action as to him for the reason that venue cannot be properly laid in this court if he is included as a party defendant.

The…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ex Parte CollettSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Olberding v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Prestonettes, Inc. v. CotySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. MacOn Grocery Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1910

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hodson v. AH Robins Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1981
  2. Norma Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  3. Bodimetric Health Services, Inc. v. Aetna Life & CasualtyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  4. Bodimetric Health Services, Inc. v. Aetna Life & CasualtyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API