Legal Opinion

Peebles v. . Taylor

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1896PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Civil actioN, for the recovery of a tract of land containing 350 acres, tried at Fall Term, 1895, of NorthamptoN Superior Court before Boyhin, J., and a jury. There was a verdict for the defendants and from the judgment thereon the plaintiff appealed. The facts are stated in the opinion of Chief Justice Eairoloth.

1Opinion of the Court

Faircloth, C. J.:

The law of this State for the assessment of property and the collection of taxes was materially changed by the act of 1889, ch. 218, now found in the act of 1895, ch. 116. In the former, Section 72, and in the latter, Section 66, it is enacted that the sheriff’s deed to a purchaser of land sold for taxes shall be presumptive evidence, in all courts of the State, of certain facts therein enumerated, and shall be conclusive evidence of other facts therein stated. In Section 77 of the first named act, and Section 71 of the second, it is declared : “No sale of real property for…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Price v. SlagleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. King v. Cooper.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  3. Price v. . SlagleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Headman v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  5. Fulcher v. . FulcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API