Legal Opinion

Fulcher v. . Fulcher

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 1, 1898PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Civil action for the recovery of land, heard before Brown, J., by consent of parties, at February Term, 1898, of Craven Superior Court. His Honor rendered judgment for plaintiff and defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Faircloth, C. J-:

The plaintiff claims title under a sheriff’s deed with a full description of the land, called a tax title. From the agreed facts and the argument, we find only one question presented, to-wit, the sufficiency of the description on the tax list, which was made under direction of the defendant. The description is “Tax list in No 2 Township, Craven County, for the year 1893.” “This was the only land owned by M. A. Fulcher in that township.” “The designation of the land is sufficient, if it affords the means of identification, and does not positively mislead the - owner.” Cooley…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Phillips v. . HookerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1867
  2. Spivey v. . GrantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  3. Peebles v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  4. Lupton v. . LuptonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stone v. . PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  2. Cooper v. . CooperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Ruark v. . HarperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  4. Alston v. . SavageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  5. Phillips v. . HookerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1867

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API