Legal Opinion

Hernandez v. Pac. Bell Tel. Co.

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided November 15, 2018No. C084350PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuarte, J.

*134Plaintiffs are class representatives of current and former employees of defendant Pacific Bell Telephone Company who install and repair video and internet services in customers' homes. They appeal a judgment in favor of defendant following cross-motions for summary judgment or summary adjudication. Plaintiffs sought compensation for the time they spent traveling in an employer-provided vehicle--loaded with equipment and tools--between their homes and a customer's residence (the worksite) under an optional and voluntary Home Dispatch Program.

The trial court, like federal courts that have…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Morillion v. Royal Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Tidewater Marine Western, Inc. v. BradshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Robert B. Reich, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. New York City Transit Authority, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  5. Gattuso v. Harte-Hanks Shoppers, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. George Huerta v. Csi Elec. Contractors, IncCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
  2. Bill Taylor v. Cox Communications CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  3. Huerta v. CSI Electrical ContractorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2024
  4. Jericho Nicolas v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2021
  5. Lingle v. Centimark Corp.District Court, E.D. California · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API