Hernandez v. Pac. Bell Tel. Co.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtDuarte, J.
*134Plaintiffs are class representatives of current and former employees of defendant Pacific Bell Telephone Company who install and repair video and internet services in customers' homes. They appeal a judgment in favor of defendant following cross-motions for summary judgment or summary adjudication. Plaintiffs sought compensation for the time they spent traveling in an employer-provided vehicle--loaded with equipment and tools--between their homes and a customer's residence (the worksite) under an optional and voluntary Home Dispatch Program.
The trial court, like federal courts that have…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Morillion v. Royal Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Tidewater Marine Western, Inc. v. BradshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Robert B. Reich, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. New York City Transit Authority, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Gattuso v. Harte-Hanks Shoppers, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- George Huerta v. Csi Elec. Contractors, IncCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Bill Taylor v. Cox Communications CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Huerta v. CSI Electrical ContractorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2024
- Jericho Nicolas v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2021
- Lingle v. Centimark Corp.District Court, E.D. California · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.