Lingle v. Centimark Corp.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 | Anthony Lingle, No. 2:22-cev-01471-KJM-JDP 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 Centimark Corporation, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Anthony Lingle has renewed his motion seeking the court’s preliminary approval 18 | of the parties’ agreement to settle this proposed class action. The court grants the motion, as 19 | explained below. 20 | I. BACKGROUND 21 Lingle alleges Centimark, his former employer, violated the California Labor Code and 22 | the state’s Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) by…