Prukala v. Elle
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
A. RICHARD CAPUTO, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Hearst Communications, Inc.1 (“Hearst”) (Doc. 3). Hearst moves to dismiss Plaintiff Christina Prukala’s Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). In each count of the Complaint, because Plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, Hearst’s motion to dismiss will be granted.
BACKGROUND
The facts as alleged in the Complaint are as follows:
Plaintiff received a series of electronic mail messages on her cellular telephone soliciting, either…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- La Vigne v. Costco Wholesale Corp.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Denius v. Real Time Resolutions, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
- PINE v. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- RICHARD v. GOODWILL SOUTHWEST PENNSYLVANIADistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
- Reed v. GarciaDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2023